Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:04

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
500-Million-Year-Old Mystery Fossil Rewrites Early Animal Evolution - SciTechDaily
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is the difference between sales incentives and sales promotions?
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Americans Are Growing Less Interested in Buying Electric Vehicles, Study Says - Road & Track
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Switch 2 Tears Of The Kingdom Confirms Link Respects Women - Kotaku
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Staying in This Place Too Long Could Change How You Age, Scientists Say - The Daily Galaxy
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.